SaaS Payments

What is a Payment Provider Migration?

Author: Oleksandra Butenko, Copywriter

Reviewed by: George Ploaie, Chief Operating Officer (COO)

What is a Payment Provider Migration

What is a Payment Provider Migration?

Payment provider migration is simply moving your payment gateway, PSP, acquirer, or payment orchestrator to a different PSP. For SaaS companies, the migration generally involves switching integrations, routing logic, recurring billing data, and tokens with the checkout process running uninterrupted. Tokenization is a procedure where PANs are exchanged for tokens, leading to systems handling tokens and possibly altering PCI exposure levels.

Keep in Mind:

Define your migration scope early, since it shapes your PCI DSS obligations. Switching gateway, PSP, acquirer, or orchestration layer keeps you as the merchant of record, so your obligations and only validation scope shift. If you opt to use a Merchant of Record, they assume the role of the legal seller and the associated merchant-side PCI DSS responsibility, which limits your compliance obligations; some remaining scope persists if your own systems process card data.

 

What are the benefits of Migrating Payment Providers?

Changing payment providers may affect various aspects of business and operations. Key characteristics encompass specific authorization rate levels, varying payment processing fee structures, modified fraud monitoring, geographic availability, and user interaction aspects influenced by transaction success rates.

In terms of SaaS businesses, this is expected to be associated with various outcomes:

  •       An increase of 2-4% in authorization rates.
  •       Chargeback rates exhibit a measurable quantity.
  •       The per-transaction cost is recorded at a lower specific figure.
  •       Fewer customer support tickets.
  •       Sensitive data protection can involve tokens.

What are the challenges and risks of Payment Provider Migration?

The payment migration process involves various components, and the understanding of associated risks relates to operational or procedural considerations.

  •       The analysis explores the factors of interruptions, downtime, and transaction failures, and their significance for revenue and customer trust.
  •       A range of token transfer functionalities is presented by different providers; some do not include import or export capabilities.
  •       Data mapping, in the context of moving confidential customer and transaction records, can present differences.
  •       Maintaining PCI DSS scope and compliance level throughout the migration process.
  •       A temporary decrease in authorization rates was noted following the change.
  •       Disruptions that elicit customer feedback impact the user experience.
  •       Webhooks parity, retries, and refunds have to work properly across different systems.
  •       Recurring billing continuity must be carefully planned not to interrupt the subscribers.

How do you prepare for a Payment Provider Migration?

Identify in-depth all your payment system components, flows, fees, contracts, and methods of payment first. You need to check your token inventory, recurring billing dependencies, fraud settings, and report requirements to list all integration points and impacts. You also need to ensure that the transition is planned with your rollout and rollback options as well as success metrics. Finally, prepare your team for the switch by testing in a sandbox with your new provider and running “soft-launches” to reduce disruption when the final migration ​‍​‌‍​‍‌happens.

 

What are the key steps in the Payment Provider Migration process?

Well-executed payment provider migration involves a series of actions: audit, select, implement, migrate, and decommission in that exact order.

  1.   Analyze your current infrastructure, performance levels, and your business requirements.
  2.   Decide on the providers to go with.
  3.   Address technical items. Ensure the technical side of the change to your system is covered.
  4.   Move data and tokens. Transfer the content to your new system.
  5.   Perform testing and parallel live transactions. Catch errors during extensive testing and run both systems to become familiar with the new one.
  6.   The process involves a gradual shutdown of the old system, followed by its decommissioning. You can decommission the older system or not do that at all, but decommission it in parts.
Pro Tip:

Use feature flags or routing logic to control traffic percentages and immediate fallback at every stage.

How do you choose a new payment provider?

Choosing providers based on factors that influence their performance and adaptability to future changes is essential. Criteria should include 

  • authorization speed, 
  • range of payments handled, 
  • the areas covered, 
  • token portability, 
  • fraud tools, 
  • detailed reporting, 
  • guaranteed uptime/SLA
  • developer tools, etc.
Pro Tip:

Focusing on providers that offer token migration and standardized vault structures can impact vendor lock-in and the complexity of future transitions.

 

What are the best practices for a successful Payment Provider Migration?

Stage

Traffic to new provider

Goal

Canary

1-5%

The validation of live transactions considers associated exposure levels

Ramp

10-20%

Confirm stability under real volume

Scale

20% and up

A higher number of steps is observed during performance monitoring

Cutover

100%

Full switch, old gateway retained as fallback

Keep the existing gateway running as a fallback, and set up real-time monitoring of your key metrics. Track these continuously to catch issues early:

  • Authorization rates and latency.
  • Observations related to error codes and webhook operational states.
  • Refund volumes.
  • Customer support inquiries.

 

How do you minimize disruption during a Payment Provider Migration?

Ensure that your current payment gateway remains fully active and operational during the integration and testing phase of the new one. Then redirect a relatively small volume of traffic to the new system by canary routing each transaction as testing until full switchover. The live systems strategy is often connected with reduced interruption, which can facilitate live migration without requiring scheduled downtime.

Keep in Mind:

Brief your customer support and finance teams well in advance so they’re ready to handle edge cases quickly.

Conclusion

A transition between two payment providers for software-as-a-service (SaaS) companies involves payment system adaptation, which impacts authorization rates, associated costs, and security measures. These results, however, can only be achieved with thorough preparation, a system carrying forward tokens, and a rolling release. This strategy pertains to addressing downtime occurrences and regulatory requirements, which may be associated with a low level of operational disturbance and facilitate conducting a switch.

Ready to get started?

We've been where you are. Let's share our 18 years of experience and make your global dreams a reality.
Mosaic image
en_USEnglish